Screenwriting
You probably won't hear too much from me today because I'm busy finishing the rewrite of my script. That's right, I'm almost done. Drinks on the house.
Thursday, August 05, 2004
Wednesday, August 04, 2004
Beck Rides Again
Interesting stuff regarding Corgan. He was slamming former Pumpkin James Ihan on past posts. It would seem that the only former bandmate Corgan gets along with is Jimmy Chamberlin...
Moving away from the sometimes dark, sometimes unbearably sunny alt-rocker, I should note that there's a new album by folk-singer, groove master, country-boy extrordinare Beck on the horizon. This new album has been reported for some time as being much more in line with albums like Odelay and Midnight Vultures. You can read all about it on Pitchfork. They even have some songtitles from the new album and info on a surprise collaboration.
B.C. Rides Again
There's a new message from Billy Corgan at his site. He's currently working on a new album. He also has some "not so kind words" about former Zwan mates. Ouch.
Do any of you Pumpkinheads know what's up with Adore? I was listening to my copy the other day and it's scratched beyond repair. I need to replace it, but it appears to be out of print. Yes? I just looked online, though. I have yet to visit the local music shop.
Su-plise!
(No spoilers)
Shyamalan has developed a well crafted ability to draw in his viewers. He does this with character development, music, tense drama and other methods. These methods are often compared to Hitchcock’s. He takes stories that could otherwise be deemed ridiculous if done by another director, and makes them engaging. I very much agree with Roger Ebert when he said:
“...the writer-director, has been successful in evoking horror from minimalist stories, as in ‘Signs,’ which if you think about it rationally is absurd -- but you get too involved to think rationally.”
I was only disappointed with the movie as it came to its near end. The first 90 minutes were just as engaging as his previous two works. Then, there were the two surprises. The first being too obvious, though, I had not guessed it. It was one of those surprises that makes you blurt out “that’s it?” It completely made sense but didn’t match the intensity of the build up.
The second twist, the one that was supposed to be “the big one” also did not trigger a climatic emotional response. In fact, it was one of my few guesses. Would I have thought different if it wasn’t one of my guesses? I sincerely doubt it. The major flaw was that the “shock” was more appropriate for the characters of the movie, the newest generation of the villagers. We as an audience simply cannot relate to the contrast. Did Shyamalan confuse the newest generation of villagers for the audience? It felt like it.
Perhaps after Josh sees the movie, we can openly discuss the specifics of the “surprises.”
Monday, August 02, 2004
A story more fragile then Mr. Glass himself
They say that this review has a surprise ending...
Yes, after months of heated anticipation I finally got a chance to see M. Night Shyamalan’s latest work The Village Saturday night. Shyamalan gained my admiration years ago with his dark portrayal of a hero’s ascension in Unbreakable. He cemented that admiration with Signs, a work that smacked of Hitchcock influences and techniques. With slow moving and methodical plots I saw a direction that gracefully revealed the cinematic landscape of his stories. His brilliant cinematography and visuals didn’t hurt either. Yes, until now the name M. Night Shyamalan was associated with the words “sublime cinema”. But with The Village the young filmmaker has produced a film of high expectations and mediocre achievements.
This new movie revolves around the story of a small isolated 19th century village and the fearsome race of malignant “creatures” that live in the surrounding woods. The villagers, holding themselves to a pact with the creatures, have agreed to never enter the woods. Likewise, the creatures have agreed to not disturb the peace of the quaint community. However, when the film begins, that pact between man and creature is wearing thin.
It’s around this basic premise that Shyamalan develops the film by focusing upon Joaquin Phoenix’s character Lucius and the relationship shared with romantic interest Ivy Walker, played by Bryce Dallas Howard. Despite Ivy’s blindness and Lucius’ introversion, the two develop a strong connection with one another. Shyamalan always created strong characters, and through this blossoming relationship the Village enjoys some of its strongest moments. The story is lean and fast; the cinematography is picturesque; but above all the story’s characters were nicely crafted and dimensional. Howard in particular lovingly plays Ivy as being colorful and emotive. Lucius is revealed by Phoenix as being quiet and contemplative. Even Adrien Brody, an actor I normally dislike, nicely pulls off the mental simplicity and thickness of his character Noah Percy. With masterful performances and well-written characterizations Shyamalan develops the first half of the film as being a fluid character drama. As I enjoyed this first half I couldn’t help but think to myself, “I can’t understand why this is getting mixed reviews”.
But then the film takes a turn for the worse. A sharp twist in the plot forces one of the film’s protagonists to make a harrowing journey into the forest inhabited by the violent creatures.
Sadly, too many new ideas and themes are expressed during this latter portion of the film. Many of these ideas have thin ties to the stronger plots introduced in the beginning of the story. Moreover, such new elements barely manage to germinate over the rough landscape of the second half and few feel truly connected with the strong characters and emotions of the first half. It’s as if Shyamalan mashed together enough ideas for two films, one being his usual suspense fair and the other a romantic character drama. Yet, while one would imagine his suspense roots taking over in the story, you can’t help but feel like he’s asleep at the wheel. The story construction throws out revelations and then backs up and tries to build suspense through plots that it previously dismantled. Motivations grow to be unclear and the delightful interplay between the film’s characters becomes muted.
And as for those who hope for salvation by his signature “twist” at the end of the film, don’t hope for too much. Yes, even the film’s ending, almost guaranteed to be a doozy, only ends up feeling like it was tacked on at the last minute. It’s abrasive and dull. By no means is this ending complementary of the film’s plot like so many of Shyamalan’s previous finales.
You want a real shocker of an ending? Here it is: after a string of masterworks M. Night has created what can be called his first real disappointment. Perhaps the real disappointment lies in the fact that this let down comes about due to his trademark suspense techniques. They were innovative and witty in Signs. Here they’re simply gimmicky and intrusive. The monsters, if they can be called monsters, are revealed with difficulty and awkwardness, completely unlike the amiable progression of the aliens in Signs. And by the time the “surprise” ending is over, the story wraps up leaving the viewer feeling no delight whatsoever in the story’s resolution. M. Night has failed with The Village. He made a film that was unique in its own right and then forced the atmosphere of his previous works upon it. You heard me; The Village was mediocre. You wanted a surprise ending and you got it.
XLent!
The new Canon XL2 mini-DV camcorder looks pretty sweet. Sorry for the long post, but I must list these. Here's the new major features:
16:9 and 4:3 aspect ratio shooting formats
With an increasing consumer shift towards widescreen TVs that deliver the full width of film-based theatrical movies, plus the resulting need for productions in the 16:9 aspect ratio, Canon's XL2 offers both the standard 4:3 aspect ratio and the 16:9 widescreen TV aspect ratio. Representing the ratio of the screen width to its height, the 4:3 aspect ratio is that of the common TV screen, and is the most commonly used aspect ratio in broadcasting today.
The 16:9 aspect ratio is the more common aspect ratio for film-based movies, and produces full screen playback on widescreen TVs. 16:9 also is the world standard aspect ratio for HDTV.
By offering a camcorder that is able to be switched between the two aspect ratios, Canon opens the door for multiple production options with the same camera -- the XL2.
Variable frame rates
60i / 30p / 24p (2:3 and 2:3:3:2 both with 1/48th second shutter speed) frame rates are available in the XL2.
The demands being made on the video production community to be able to provide solutions under a multitude of different scenarios have been met with the Canon XL2. It delivers 60i, 30p, 24p (2:3 and 2:3:3:2) frame rates. 60i (interlaced) is the standard video frame rate that has been in use for decades; it's what you see on your home TV, and is captured by handheld consumer camcorders. Progressive (non-interlaced) scanning mimics a film camera's frame-by-frame image capture. 30p, or 30-frame progressive, a non-interlaced format, produces video at the rate of 30 frames per second, delivering spectacular clarity for high speed subjects. Shooting in 30P mode offers video with no interlace artifacts.
The 24p frame rate, for example, is now widely adopted by those planning on transferring the video signal to film. But film/videomakers turn to 24p for the "cine" look even if their productions are not going to be transferred to film, simply because of the "look" of the frame rate. Also just as important as 24p, is the shutter speed of 1/48th per second. This is the standard shutter speed that movie cameras use. The combination of 24p frame rate and 1/48th perfectly mimic a motion film camera.
24p with 2:3 pulldown produces video with the look and motion of film. (24p, used in conjunction with a cine gamma curve on the XL2, produces images that have similar tonal characteristics as film. This mode is used when the finished video will be shown on television. 24p with 2:3:3:2 pulldown, is used when the video is going to be transferred to film. The 2:3:3:2 pulldown allows to editing software to extract true 24 frames a second.
SMPTE time code
The Canon XL2 offers many on-camera enhancements to help capture high-quality footage, including features commonly found on broadcast camcorders. Among these is the placement of a SMPTE time code on the tape. SMPTE (Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers) time code is a digital signal that assigns a number to every frame of video, representing hours, minutes, seconds, frames, plus some additional information. The SMPTE time code is used to identify a precise location on a video tape, a mainstay of professional editing allowing all tape and equipment to work together for precise editing.
You can choose Drop, Non-Drop, Rec Run and Free Run modes. Also provided is User bit settings, allowing the inclusion of reel number or other user data.
The XL2 also generates SMPTE color bars with 1 KHz tone (-12dB and -20dB). SMPTE color bars with tone are the standard method of setting up video and audio monitors and edit suites. By using industry standard color bars and tone, the XL2 fits in with all production equipment.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)